Skip to main content

Whoop vs FDA: Unauthorized Blood Pressure Feature Sparks Regulatory Clash Over Wellness Claims

 

Whoop vs FDA: Unauthorized Blood Pressure Feature Sparks Regulatory Clash Over Wellness Claims

Key Takeaways

  • 🚨 FDA Warning Issued: The FDA sent WHOOP a warning letter on July 14, 2025, declaring its Blood Pressure Insights (BPI) feature an unapproved medical device .
  • ⚖️ Regulatory Dispute: WHOOP argues BPI is a wellness tool (exempt from FDA review), while the FDA insists blood pressure measurement is inherently clinical .
  • 💡 How BPI Works: Uses morning heart rate, HRV, and blood flow patterns (calibrated via a cuff) to estimate daily systolic/diastolic ranges—not real-time readings .
  • ⚠️ FDA’s Safety Concerns: Inaccurate readings could delay hypertension treatment, risking stroke or heart failure .
  • 💰 Consumer Impact: BPI is a key selling point of WHOOP’s $359/year “Life” tier. Removal could devalue the subscription .
  • ⏳ Current Status: BPI remains active in the U.S. as WHOOP contests the FDA’s stance .

The FDA-WHOOP Clash Over Blood Pressure Insights

What’s Happening?

On July 14, 2025, the FDA sent WHOOP a formal warning letter. The agency said WHOOP’s Blood Pressure Insights (BPI) feature is an unapproved medical device. The FDA told WHOOP to stop marketing BPI immediately. They said the feature violates U.S. law .

The FDA pointed to WHOOP’s own website. It showed descriptions like “daily systolic and diastolic blood pressure estimations” and “medical-grade health insights.” The agency said these phrases prove BPI is intended for medical use—not just wellness .

WHOOP got 15 business days to respond. If they ignore this, the FDA could take action. This includes fines, product seizures, or even court orders to stop sales .

Why the FDA Calls BPI a Medical Device

The FDA’s argument centers on intent. Under U.S. law, a product is a medical device if it diagnoses disease or affects bodily functions. Blood pressure measurement, the FDA says, is “inherently associated” with diagnosing hypertension .

Even though BPI only gives daily estimates (not real-time readings), the FDA says that doesn’t matter. The feature still outputs blood pressure numbers. It also color-codes results (green/yellow/orange) to indicate risk levels. This, the FDA says, could lead users to self-diagnose .

The agency also noted real-world evidence. Some users already treat BPI as a diagnostic tool. For example, tracking hypertension with it. Disclaimers don’t help, the FDA says. The design itself encourages medical use .

Table: FDA’s Key Arguments Against BPI

Table summarizing FDA's stance on clinical issues: Intended Use, Risk Level, Design, and Marketing, with relevant laws cited for each issue.

WHOOP’s Defense: Wellness, Not Medicine

WHOOP disagrees strongly. They say BPI is purely a wellness feature. It helps users see how lifestyle affects performance. Not diagnose disease .

In their public response, WHOOP compared BPI to other wellness metrics. Like heart rate variability (HRV) or respiratory rate. These don’t need FDA clearance. Blood pressure, they argue, should be treated the same .

They also stressed BPI’s design:

  • Requires calibration with a traditional cuff.
  • Only provides daily ranges (not on-demand checks).
  • Focuses on trends—not absolute numbers .

“Blood pressure acts like a mirror,” WHOOP wrote. It reflects how your body handles stress, sleep, or exercise. That’s wellness, not medicine .

How Blood Pressure Insights Actually Works

BPI isn’t like a doctor’s blood pressure cuff. Here’s how it works:

  1. Calibration: Users take 3 readings with a standard cuff. This sets a baseline.
  2. Overnight Tracking: While you sleep, WHOOP’s sensor (on the MG device) measures heart rate, HRV, and blood flow patterns.
  3. Morning Estimate: You get a systolic/diastolic range and midpoint. Based on overnight data when the body is rested .

WHOOP trained the algorithm using 32,000 sleep sessions from 11,000+ members. They say it’s validated against clinical readings .

But accuracy isn’t the FDA’s main gripe. It’s about how the data could be used. Even precise numbers, the FDA says, belong under medical oversight .

Why Blood Pressure Is Different From Heart Rate

WHOOP asks: Why single out blood pressure? Why not heart rate or HRV?

The FDA gave a clear answer in its letter. Blood pressure is uniquely tied to disease. Hypertension is a top risk for heart attacks and strokes. Misleading readings could have dire consequences .

Dr. Ian Kronish (Columbia University Hypertension Center) explained the risk:

“If someone with hypertension gets falsely low readings, they might skip treatment. That could lead to organ damage or even death. Especially since hypertension often has no symptoms.”

Heart rate variability doesn’t carry the same risk. No one treats an HRV dip as a heart attack warning. Blood pressure? People do .

The Stakes for Consumers

If WHOOP loses this fight, users lose a feature they paid for. BPI is exclusive to the “Life” membership tier. That costs $359/year—$120 more than WHOOP’s mid-level plan .

Table: WHOOP Membership Tiers (U.S.)

Subscription tiers chart with three options: One at $199/year, Peak at $239/year, and Life at $359/year. Life tier includes active BPI status.

Without BPI, the Life tier offers only ECG readings. That’s a common smartwatch feature. As one Redditor said:

“We paid for this. If it’s removed, we deserve compensation.”

WHOOP cites the 21st Century Cures Act to defend BPI. This law excludes some software from medical device rules. Especially tools that “maintain or encourage a healthy lifestyle” .

But the FDA says BPI doesn’t qualify. Why? Because it’s not “unrelated to disease.” Blood pressure is inherently clinical. The agency also notes BPI isn’t “low risk.” So it falls outside the exemption .

Past products got cleared as medical devices for similar functions. Like Omron or Garmin’s FDA-approved blood pressure monitors .

What Happens Next

Right now, BPI is still available. WHOOP hasn’t pulled the feature. They’re fighting the FDA’s interpretation .

Options for WHOOP:

  • Comply: Remove BPI in the U.S. and refund users.
  • Negotiate: Change how BPI works (e.g., remove color-coding).
  • Fight: Argue in court that the FDA overstepped .

The outcome could reshape wearables. If the FDA wins, features like glucose or oxygen monitoring might face stricter rules. Even if marketed for wellness .

Expert Take: A “Big Opportunity” With Risks

Dr. Ian Kronish sees both sides. He told CNBC:

“Wearables present a big opportunity for patients. But unvalidated tools? Dangerous. The FDA’s involvement here is good for consumers.”

He urges users to talk to doctors. Don’t rely on wearables for medical decisions. Especially for blood pressure .


Frequently Asked Questions

Is WHOOP removing the blood pressure feature?

Not yet. As of July 16, 2025, Blood Pressure Insights remains active for U.S. members on the Life tier. WHOOP is contesting the FDA’s warning .

Can I trust WHOOP’s blood pressure readings?

WHOOP claims its model is validated against clinical data. But the FDA hasn’t verified its accuracy. For health decisions, use an FDA-cleared monitor like Omron .

Why did the FDA approve WHOOP’s ECG but not BPI?

ECGs got FDA clearance because WHOOP proved they detect atrial fibrillation—a specific condition. BPI estimates general blood pressure, which the FDA says is broadly clinical .

What should WHOOP Life members do now?

Keep calibrating BPI with a cuff. But discuss trends with a doctor. If WHOOP removes BPI, request a partial refund for the lost feature .

Are other wearables affected?

Samsung’s blood pressure tool isn’t available in the U.S. Apple hasn’t released one. Only FDA-cleared tools (like Omron HeartGuide) are legal here .

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Block Stock Soars 10% on S&P 500 Entry, Replaces Hess Effective July 23, 2025

  Key Takeaways S&P 500 Entry : Block (formerly Square) joins the S&P 500 on  July 23, 2025 , replacing Hess after its acquisition by Chevron . Market Reaction : Block’s stock surged  >10%  post-announcement as funds rebalanced portfolios to include it . Challenges Persist : Despite the boost, Block’s 2025 performance remains  down 14%  YTD due to weak Q1 results and tariff-related macro concerns . Strategic Significance : Entry validates Block’s pivot to blockchain/fintech and accelerates crypto’s mainstream adoption . Next Catalyst : Q2 earnings on  August 7  will test whether S&P-driven demand offsets economic headwinds . The Big News: Block Is Joining the S&P 500 Come July 23rd, Block—y’know, the company behind Square and Cash App—steps into the S&P 500. They’re takin’ Hess’s spot, which is exitin’ after Chevron wrapped up that $54 billion buyout. Hess had some juicy oil assets down in Guyana, but Chevron finally closed ...

Cloudflare 1.1.1.1 Outage Report (July 14, 2025): Global DNS Disruption Root Cause Analysis

  Key takeaways Global DNS outage : Cloudflare's 1.1.1.1 resolver failed worldwide for  62 minutes  on July 14, 2025, due to a configuration error in their service topology . Root cause : A dormant misconfiguration from June 6 linked 1.1.1.1 to a non-production service. When activated, it withdrew critical IP prefixes globally . Traffic impact : UDP/TCP/DoT queries dropped sharply, but  DNS-over-HTTPS (DoH)  via  cloudflare-dns.com  stayed stable thanks to separate IPs . Unrelated hijack : Tata Communications (AS4755) advertised 1.1.1.0/24 during the outage, worsening routing issues for some users . Resolution : Cloudflare restored services by 22:54 UTC after reverting configurations and manually re-announcing routes . Why 1.1.1.1 matters for the internet You might not think much about DNS resolvers, but they’re like the phonebooks of the internet. Cloudflare’s 1.1.1.1 launched back in 2018 as a faster, privacy-focused alternative to ISP-provided DNS. ...

High-fructose corn syrup vs. cane sugar in foods: The cost of switching ingredients

  Key Takeaways Coca-Cola's potential switch  to cane sugar follows political pressure but faces  economic hurdles  . Price disparity : High-fructose corn syrup costs  $0.35/lb  vs. cane sugar at  $1.01/lb —nearly triple. Farm impact : Eliminating corn syrup could wipe out  $5.1B in U.S. farm revenue  . Health equivalence : The FDA states  no nutritional difference  exists between the sweeteners . Consumer cost : Mexican Coke (cane sugar) costs  over 60% more  than U.S. corn-syrup versions . The President’s Truth Social Bombshell President Trump fired a post into the digital ether. He claimed Coca-Cola agreed to dump high-fructose corn syrup for "REAL Cane Sugar" in U.S. products. The announcement hit like a barstool declaration—loud, abrupt, short on details. Coca-Cola’s response? A terse nod to "new innovative offerings." No confirmation. No timeline. Just corporate speak wrapped in a question mark. The disconnect betwee...

Scale AI Layoffs: 200 Employees Cut as Company Admits GenAI Over-Expansion

  Key Takeaways Scale AI cut 200 employees (14% of staff) and 500 contractors  weeks after Meta invested $14.3 billion for a 49% stake in the company . Founder Alexandr Wang left to lead Meta’s new AI division , prompting interim CEO Jason Droege to restructure teams citing "excessive bureaucracy" and over-hiring in generative AI . Major clients like Google and OpenAI reduced work with Scale AI  following the Meta deal, triggering revenue concerns . Restructuring consolidates 16 specialized teams into 5 core units  (code, languages, experts, experimental, audio) to prioritize enterprise and government contracts . The layoffs highlight industry-wide pressure  as AI firms face scrutiny over costs, productivity gains, and business sustainability . What Actually Went Down at Scale AI? Scale AI just laid off 200 full-time employees. That’s 14% of their workforce. Plus, they cut ties with 500 contractors globally. The news hit on July 16, 2025, barely a month after Me...

UPS Driver Early Retirement: First Buyout in Company History

  Key Takeaways Historic shift : UPS offers  first-ever buyouts  to union drivers, breaking 117 years of tradition Contract clash : Teamsters call the move  "illegal" , claiming it violates job creation promises in their 2023 contract Economic squeeze : Buyouts part of UPS's  "Network of the Future"  plan to cut costs after losing Amazon business and facing trade pressures Worker uncertainty : Buyouts risk stripping  retiree healthcare  from drivers who leave early Union defiance : Teamsters urge drivers to  reject buyouts  and prepare for legal battle The Buyout Blueprint: What UPS Is Offering UPS dropped a bombshell on July 3rd, 2025: For the first time ever, full-time drivers could get cash offers to leave their jobs voluntarily. Company statements called it a " generous financial package " on top of earned retirement benefits like pensions. But details stayed fuzzy — UPS hadn't even told drivers directly yet when the Teamsters went p...

Sarepta Stock Plunges 40% as FDA Moves to Halt Gene Therapy Shipments

  Key Takeaways Sarepta Therapeutics stock plunged ~40% following a second patient death linked to its gene therapy Elevidys . FDA may pull Elevidys off the market as safety concerns mount; shipments halted for non-ambulatory patients . Therapy initially approved controversially in 2023 for ages 4-5, later expanded amid efficacy debates . Year-to-date stock loss exceeds 87%, erasing billions in market value . Duchenne muscular dystrophy patients face renewed uncertainty as treatment risks outweigh benefits for some . The Bloodbath on Nasdaq Sarepta Therapeutics stock cratered 40% in premarket trading June 16, 2025. It opened at $13.60—a far cry from its 52-week high of $150.48 . The collapse wasn't a surprise to those watching the ticker. Shares had been dying a slow death all year. By July, the year-to-date loss hit 87.5% . Shareholders stared at ruins. Trading volume exploded to 60 million shares. Average volume is 5.9 million . The market cap vaporized—$1.336 billion intraday. D...

Gen Z Stare Decoded: Viral TikTok Trend or Societal Mirror?

Key Takeaways The Gen Z stare manifests in two primary forms : a vacant expression from service workers during perceived unreasonable customer interactions ( customer service stare ) and from Gen Z customers instead of verbal responses ( customer stare ) . Pandemic isolation critically impacted social skill development : Reduced face-to-face interaction during formative years limited practice with conversational norms and non-verbal cues for many Gen Zers . It’s often misinterpreted as rudeness or disinterest : Older generations may perceive the stare as disrespectful, while Gen Z frequently views it as a legitimate response to inauthentic or inefficient interactions . Underlying factors include heightened anxiety and authenticity values : Gen Z prioritizes genuine communication and may reject performative politeness, while also experiencing higher rates of social anxiety . Workplaces are adapting training programs : Organizations recognize gaps in soft skills like interpersonal commun...