Skip to main content

Whoop vs FDA: Unauthorized Blood Pressure Feature Sparks Regulatory Clash Over Wellness Claims

 

Whoop vs FDA: Unauthorized Blood Pressure Feature Sparks Regulatory Clash Over Wellness Claims

Key Takeaways

  • 🚨 FDA Warning Issued: The FDA sent WHOOP a warning letter on July 14, 2025, declaring its Blood Pressure Insights (BPI) feature an unapproved medical device .
  • ⚖️ Regulatory Dispute: WHOOP argues BPI is a wellness tool (exempt from FDA review), while the FDA insists blood pressure measurement is inherently clinical .
  • 💡 How BPI Works: Uses morning heart rate, HRV, and blood flow patterns (calibrated via a cuff) to estimate daily systolic/diastolic ranges, not real-time readings .
  • ⚠️ FDA’s Safety Concerns: Inaccurate readings could delay hypertension treatment, risking stroke or heart failure .
  • 💰 Consumer Impact: BPI is a key selling point of WHOOP’s $359/year “Life” tier. Removal could devalue the subscription .
  • ⏳ Current Status: BPI remains active in the U.S. as WHOOP contests the FDA’s stance .

The FDA-WHOOP Clash Over Blood Pressure Insights

What’s Happening?

On July 14, 2025, the FDA sent WHOOP a formal warning letter. The agency said WHOOP’s Blood Pressure Insights (BPI) feature is an unapproved medical device. The FDA told WHOOP to stop marketing BPI immediately. They said the feature violates U.S. law .

The FDA pointed to WHOOP’s own website. It showed descriptions like “daily systolic and diastolic blood pressure estimations” and “medical-grade health insights.” The agency said these phrases prove BPI is intended for medical use, not just wellness .

WHOOP got 15 business days to respond. If they ignore this, the FDA could take action. This includes fines, product seizures, or even court orders to stop sales .

Why the FDA Calls BPI a Medical Device

The FDA’s argument centers on intent. Under U.S. law, a product is a medical device if it diagnoses disease or affects bodily functions. Blood pressure measurement, the FDA says, is “inherently associated” with diagnosing hypertension .

Even though BPI only gives daily estimates (not real-time readings), the FDA says that doesn’t matter. The feature still outputs blood pressure numbers. It also color-codes results (green/yellow/orange) to indicate risk levels. This, the FDA says, could lead users to self-diagnose .

The agency also noted real-world evidence. Some users already treat BPI as a diagnostic tool. For example, tracking hypertension with it. Disclaimers don’t help, the FDA says. The design itself encourages medical use .

Table: FDA’s Key Arguments Against BPI

Table summarizing FDA's stance on clinical issues: Intended Use, Risk Level, Design, and Marketing, with relevant laws cited for each issue.

WHOOP’s Defense: Wellness, Not Medicine

WHOOP disagrees strongly. They say BPI is purely a wellness feature. It helps users see how lifestyle affects performance. Not diagnose disease .

In their public response, WHOOP compared BPI to other wellness metrics. Like heart rate variability (HRV) or respiratory rate. These don’t need FDA clearance. Blood pressure, they argue, should be treated the same .

They also stressed BPI’s design:

  • Requires calibration with a traditional cuff.
  • Only provides daily ranges (not on-demand checks).
  • Focuses on trends, not absolute numbers .

“Blood pressure acts like a mirror,” WHOOP wrote. It reflects how your body handles stress, sleep, or exercise. That’s wellness, not medicine .

How Blood Pressure Insights Actually Works

BPI isn’t like a doctor’s blood pressure cuff. Here’s how it works:

  1. Calibration: Users take 3 readings with a standard cuff. This sets a baseline.
  2. Overnight Tracking: While you sleep, WHOOP’s sensor (on the MG device) measures heart rate, HRV, and blood flow patterns.
  3. Morning Estimate: You get a systolic/diastolic range and midpoint. Based on overnight data when the body is rested .

WHOOP trained the algorithm using 32,000 sleep sessions from 11,000+ members. They say it’s validated against clinical readings .

But accuracy isn’t the FDA’s main gripe. It’s about how the data could be used. Even precise numbers, the FDA says, belong under medical oversight .

Why Blood Pressure Is Different From Heart Rate

WHOOP asks: Why single out blood pressure? Why not heart rate or HRV?

The FDA gave a clear answer in its letter. Blood pressure is uniquely tied to disease. Hypertension is a top risk for heart attacks and strokes. Misleading readings could have dire consequences .

Dr. Ian Kronish (Columbia University Hypertension Center) explained the risk:

“If someone with hypertension gets falsely low readings, they might skip treatment. That could lead to organ damage or even death. Especially since hypertension often has no symptoms.”

Heart rate variability doesn’t carry the same risk. No one treats an HRV dip as a heart attack warning. Blood pressure? People do .

The Stakes for Consumers

If WHOOP loses this fight, users lose a feature they paid for. BPI is exclusive to the “Life” membership tier. That costs $359/year, $120 more than WHOOP’s mid-level plan .

Table: WHOOP Membership Tiers (U.S.)

Subscription tiers chart with three options: One at $199/year, Peak at $239/year, and Life at $359/year. Life tier includes active BPI status.

Without BPI, the Life tier offers only ECG readings. That’s a common smartwatch feature. As one Redditor said:

“We paid for this. If it’s removed, we deserve compensation.”

WHOOP cites the 21st Century Cures Act to defend BPI. This law excludes some software from medical device rules. Especially tools that “maintain or encourage a healthy lifestyle” .

But the FDA says BPI doesn’t qualify. Why? Because it’s not “unrelated to disease.” Blood pressure is inherently clinical. The agency also notes BPI isn’t “low risk.” So it falls outside the exemption .

Past products got cleared as medical devices for similar functions. Like Omron or Garmin’s FDA-approved blood pressure monitors .

What Happens Next

Right now, BPI is still available. WHOOP hasn’t pulled the feature. They’re fighting the FDA’s interpretation .

Options for WHOOP:

  • Comply: Remove BPI in the U.S. and refund users.
  • Negotiate: Change how BPI works (e.g., remove color-coding).
  • Fight: Argue in court that the FDA overstepped .

The outcome could reshape wearables. If the FDA wins, features like glucose or oxygen monitoring might face stricter rules. Even if marketed for wellness .

Expert Take: A “Big Opportunity” With Risks

Dr. Ian Kronish sees both sides. He told CNBC:

“Wearables present a big opportunity for patients. But unvalidated tools? Dangerous. The FDA’s involvement here is good for consumers.”

He urges users to talk to doctors. Don’t rely on wearables for medical decisions. Especially for blood pressure .


Frequently Asked Questions

Is WHOOP removing the blood pressure feature?

Not yet. As of July 16, 2025, Blood Pressure Insights remains active for U.S. members on the Life tier. WHOOP is contesting the FDA’s warning .

Can I trust WHOOP’s blood pressure readings?

WHOOP claims its model is validated against clinical data. But the FDA hasn’t verified its accuracy. For health decisions, use an FDA-cleared monitor like Omron .

Why did the FDA approve WHOOP’s ECG but not BPI?

ECGs got FDA clearance because WHOOP proved they detect atrial fibrillation, a specific condition. BPI estimates general blood pressure, which the FDA says is broadly clinical .

What should WHOOP Life members do now?

Keep calibrating BPI with a cuff. But discuss trends with a doctor. If WHOOP removes BPI, request a partial refund for the lost feature .

Are other wearables affected?

Samsung’s blood pressure tool isn’t available in the U.S. Apple hasn’t released one. Only FDA-cleared tools (like Omron HeartGuide) are legal here .

Popular posts from this blog

PepsiCo Stock Jumps as Elliott Management Takes $4B Activist Stake, Proposes Turnaround for 50% Upside

PepsiCo Stock Jumps as Elliott Management Takes $4B Activist Stake, Proposes Turnaround for 50% Upside Key Takeaways Elliott Management disclosed a  $4 billion stake  in PepsiCo, making them one of the company's largest shareholders and immediately triggering a  5% stock price jump  . The activist investor believes PepsiCo has  undervalued potential  and proposes operational changes that could lead to a  50% upside  in the stock price from current levels . PepsiCo's  North American beverages division  has been a particular underperformer, with strategic missteps and operational issues hurting growth and margins . This isn't PepsiCo's first rodeo with activist investors - Nelson Peltz  pushed for similar changes  about a decade ago but was unsuccessful . The company's response has been  cautiously open  to feedback, stating they'll review Elliott's perspectives within their existing strategy . So What Exactly Happened ...

Nestlé CEO Laurent Freixe Dismissed After Romantic Relationship Probe with Subordinate | Philipp Navratil Appointed New CEO

Nestlé CEO Laurent Freixe Dismissed After Romantic Relationship Probe with Subordinate | Philipp Navratil Appointed New CEO Key Takeaways CEO dismissed for policy violation : Laurent Freixe was ousted immediately after an investigation found he had an undisclosed romantic relationship with a direct subordinate, breaching Nestlé's Code of Business Conduct . Seasoned replacement : Philipp Navratil, a Nestlé veteran since 2001 who most recently led Nespresso, has been appointed as the new CEO effective immediately . Board emphasizes values : Chairman Paul Bulcke stated the dismissal was "necessary" to uphold the company's governance foundations and values, despite thanking Freixe for his years of service . No strategy change expected : The Board confirmed Nestlé will maintain it's current strategic direction under Navratil's leadership . Second CEO departure in a year : This marks Nestlé's second abrupt CEO change in approximately 12 months, following Mark Sc...

Rhode Island's Taylor Swift Tax on Luxury Vacation Homes Sparks Nationwide Trend: Policy Impact & Market Reactions

Rhode Island's Taylor Swift Tax on Luxury Vacation Homes Sparks Nationwide Trend: Policy Impact & Market Reactions Key takeaways The "Taylor Swift Tax"  is Rhode Island's new surcharge on non-owner-occupied properties valued over $1 million, adding  $2.50 per $500  above the threshold This is part of a broader trend  of states targeting wealthy second-home owners to address housing affordability issues, with similar measures in Montana, Los Angeles, and other areas Reactions are deeply divided  between supporters who see it as addressing housing inequality and critics who argue it punishes economic contributors and may backfire The market response  includes buyers hesitating, exploring loopholes, or looking at neighboring states, though wealth flight hasn't happened yet Implementation challenges  include enforcement difficulties, potential legal challenges, and questions about revenue projections What exactly is this "Taylor Swift Tax"? So Rhode Is...

Equinor's $941M Lifeline: Ørsted Rescue Amid Trump's Offshore Wind Attacks | Energy Crisis

Equinor's $941M Lifeline: Ørsted Rescue Amid Trump's Offshore Wind Attacks | Energy Crisis Key Takeaways Norway's Equinor is injecting $941 million  into Danish offshore wind giant Ørsted to maintain its 10% stake, despite massive financial losses from U.S. political headwinds . Trump administration's targeted attacks  on offshore wind have caused severe project delays and cancellations, including stop-work orders on nearly completed projects . The offshore wind industry faces massive consolidation  as companies struggle with inflation, supply chain issues, and political uncertainty, leading to abandoned projects worldwide . Equinor's investment represents both a vote of confidence  and a strategic necessity, as the company aims to secure board representation and deeper collaboration with Ørsted . The future of U.S. offshore wind remains uncertain  as companies weigh legal challenges, project restructuring, and potential policy changes against continuing politic...

Trump's Federal Reserve Board Control: Implications for Interest Rates, Economic Independence & Market Stability

Trump's Federal Reserve Board Control: Implications for Interest Rates, Economic Independence & Market Stability Key Takeaways President Trump's attempt to remove Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook represents an  unprecedented challenge  to central bank independence, with potential long-term consequences for monetary policy . Historical examples from  Turkey and Argentina  demonstrate how political interference in central banking can lead to hyperinflation, currency instability, and economic crisis . The Federal Reserve's  independence from political pressure  has been a cornerstone of U.S. economic stability for decades, allowing for data-driven monetary decisions . Financial markets have shown  some concern but overall complacency  regarding Trump's Fed actions, though economists warn this could change rapidly if independence erodes further . Legal experts question whether Trump has  proper constitutional authority  to remove a sit...

Easier to Pump: Trump-Backed American Bitcoin (ABTC) Merges with Gryphon Digital Mining for Nasdaq September 2025 Debut | Eric Trump & Donald Trump Jr. Major Stakeholders | Crypto Policy Expansion

Easier to Pump: Trump-Backed American Bitcoin (ABTC) Merges with Gryphon Digital Mining for Nasdaq September 2025 Debut | Eric Trump & Donald Trump Jr. Major Stakeholders | Crypto Policy Expansion Key Takeaways American Bitcoin will begin trading on Nasdaq  in early September under ticker ABTC after completing it's reverse merger with Gryphon Digital Mining Trump family and Hut 8 maintain overwhelming control  - Combined 98% ownership stake in the new entity raises some corporate governance questions Strategic expansion into Asian markets  already underway with Eric Trump touring Hong Kong and Japan to scout acquisition targets Pro-crypto Trump administration policies  creating favorable regulatory environment for Bitcoin businesses What is American Bitcoin Anyway? American Bitcoin launched just this past March (2025) as a collaboration between Hut 8 Corp and the Trump brothers - Eric Trump and Donald Trump Jr. The company bills itself as a "pure-play bitcoin min...

Elon Musk: 80% of Tesla's Future Value from Optimus Robots Amid EV Sales Slump

Elon Musk: 80% of Tesla's Future Value from Optimus Robots Amid EV Sales Slump Key Takeaways 🤖 Musk claims Optimus robots will eventually represent 80% of Tesla's total value 📉 Tesla facing significant EV sales decline due to competition and aging lineup 🏭 First Optimus units planned for factory work in 2025-2026 timeframe 🤼 Facing strong competition from established robotics companies 📊 Wall Street remains skeptical with "Hold" rating on TSLA stock Musk's Bold Prediction on Tesla's Robot Future So I've been following Tesla's transition from car company to robotics firm, and Elon Musk just dropped another bombshell. On Monday, he claimed that approximately 80% of Tesla's value will eventually come from their Optimus humanoid robot project . This isn't the first time he's made big claims about Optimus - back in mid-2024, he said these robots could eventually make Tesla a $25 trillion company . That $25 trillion figure is absolutely mind...