U.S. Lifts Chip Design Software Ban on China | Trade Truce 2025

 

Key Takeaways

• US lifts EDA ban: The Biden administration reversed May 2023 export restrictions on chip design software (EDA tools) to China, effective immediately .
• Trade truce progress: This move implements part of the US-China "London agreement," where China eased rare earth export curbs in exchange for US tech restrictions .
• Major companies impacted: Synopsys, Cadence, and Siemens EDA resumed sales to China, with their shares jumping 5-7% post-announcement .
• Tariffs remain high: Broader US tariffs on China stay at 55%, combining pre-existing duties with newer "reciprocal" and "fentanyl" levies .
• Semiconductor dependence: The trio controls 70% of China’s EDA market, making the initial ban a critical vulnerability .

---

Why the U.S. Lifting Chip Design Software Bans Signals a Fragile Tech Truce

1. What Just Happened with Chip Software and China?

So the U.S. Commerce Department basically reversed course. Late May, they’d told companies like Synopsys and Cadence - two giants in chip design software - that they couldn’t sell their advanced tools to China without getting special licenses first. That hit hard, cause China’s a massive market for them, accounting for like 10-16% of their yearly sales . Then suddenly on July 3rd, the government sends new letters. Saying those restrictions? Gone. Done .

For engineers in Shanghai or Shenzhen, it meant getting cut off from essential Electronic Design Automation (EDA) tools overnight in May. Think of it like having your oxygen supply switched off. These programs are how you design every kind of microchip, from the simple ones in a coffee maker to the super complex ones that power AI systems. Without them, China’s whole semiconductor industry was facing a brick wall.

The three biggest players - Synopsys, Cadence, and Siemens EDA (yep, part of the German company but based in Oregon) - confirmed they’re now restoring access . Cadence said they got the notice and are “working to resume support.” Synopsys expects systems back online within days. Siemens actually flipped the switch fastest, saying they’d already “restored full access” for their Chinese customers .

Table: Timeline of the EDA Restrictions and Removal

Alot of people in the industry breathed a sigh of relief. Cause honestly? Nobody thought this was gonna help America “win” anything. It just hurt businesses on both sides.

2. Why EDA Software is Such a Big Deal in the Chip War

You ever try building a skyscraper without blueprints? Or maybe baking a fancy cake without a recipe? Yeah, that’s what designing modern semiconductors is like without EDA software. These tools are the foundation. They’re how engineers map out billions of microscopic transistors onto a sliver of silicon no bigger than your thumbnail. Get it wrong? The chip’s useless. Or worse, it melts.

The market’s dominated by just three players: Synopsys (about 31% global share), Cadence (30%), and Siemens EDA (13%) . Together, they control a whopping 70% of China’s EDA market . That’s why the U.S. targeting this software back in May felt like a body blow. It wasn’t just about stopping military tech; it threatened everything from smartphone chips to car parts China makes for the world.

China knew this was coming, kinda. They’ve been pouring money into homegrown EDA startups for years, trying to break free from relying on American tools. But progress is slow. Building software this complex, that has to model physics down to the atomic level? Takes decades of refinement. Synopsys and Cadence didn’t get here overnight. So when the ban hit, even Chinese state media admitted it was a “wake-up call” .

This is why lifting the ban matters so much, right now. It keeps China’s tech factories humming. Lets their engineers keep designing. But it also shows how vulnerable global tech chains really are. One policy shift in Washington, and entire industries in another hemisphere start sweating.

3. The Rare Earth Magnet in the US-China Trade Deal

This whole thing – the software bans, the reversal – wasn’t happening in a vacuum. It was tit-for-tat. Back in April, China decided to flex it’s muscles. They control something like 90% of the world’s processed rare earth elements . Those obscure metals with names like neodymium and dysprosium? Vital. They go into everything: electric car motors, wind turbines, missile guidance systems, even your iPhone’s vibration motor.

So China slapped new controls on exporting them, especially the super strong rare earth magnets . Suddenly, companies outside China needed licenses to get these critical materials. Paperwork piled up. Shipments stalled. Automakers in Germany started panicking. Defense contractors in the U.S. got real nervous .

The U.S. response was swift and broad. They didn’t just hit back at rare earths directly (hard to do when you depend on the other guy!). They targeted things China desperately needed from them:

• Chip design software (the EDA tools from Synopsys, Cadence, Siemens)
• Ethane (a chemical crucial for plastics; nearly 50% of US exports go to China )
• Jet engines (like those GE makes for China’s new C919 passenger jet )

Trump’s team basically went “Oh yeah? Well how about this?” It was escalation aimed at forcing a deal. The London talks in early June became the pressure cooker. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and China’s Vice Premier He Lifeng hammered out the terms: You ease up on rare earths, we’ll lift these tech controls .

China’s Commerce Ministry later confirmed they’d “review and approve eligible licenses” for rare earths. The US would “cancel the corresponding restrictive measures” . It wasn’t love and trust. It was cold, hard bargaining with the world’s tech supply chains held hostage.

4. The Tariff Truce (Sort Of): 55% and Counting

Don’t get it twisted though. Just cause they made a deal on rare earths and chip software doesn’t mean the big trade war’s over. Not by a long shot. Those US tariffs on Chinese goods? They’re still sky-high. President Trump himself said it’s sitting at 55% right now .

How do you even get to 55%? It’s like stacking pancakes:

1. 10% “Reciprocal” Tariff: Trump slapped this on almost every country back in April. A baseline tax on imports .
2. 20% “Fentanyl” Tariff: Added in March, supposedly punishing China for the flow of illegal opioids into the US .
3. 25% Section 301 Tariffs: The original Trump-era duties from his first term, still covering thousands of Chinese products .

Table: Breakdown of Current US Tariffs on Chinese Goods (July 2025)

Meanwhile, China’s hitting back with its own duties – averaging around 32.6% on US goods . It’s messy. And it hurts. Look at the ports: US imports from China nosedived almost 30% year-over-year in May . That’s billions in trade, just... gone. Or moved to Vietnam, Mexico, places like that.

The chip software reprieve is just one piece. A temporary ceasefire in one battle of a much larger economic war. The broader “truce” on these reciprocal tariffs? It runs out in August . Then what? Nobody’s sure.

5. Winners, Losers, and Stock Market Jumpers

Okay, so who actually benefits from the US lifting the EDA ban? Obvious winners first: Synopsys, Cadence, and Siemens. Their shareholders certainly cheered. Synopsys shares shot up 6.7%, Cadence gained 5.9%, Siemens climbed 0.9% in Frankfurt right after the news broke . That’s real money, reflecting relief that their Chinese revenue streams – 10-16% of their business – weren’t getting choked off long-term .

Analysts at Mizuho had figured the May restrictions would only ding about a month’s worth of revenue for these firms in the current quarter. Now, even that minor blip is getting erased . Plus, Synopsys can probably breathe easier about its huge $35 billion buyout of Ansys, an engineering software firm. People worried China might block that deal as payback for the export controls. With the restrictions gone? Mizuho thinks it could close on time by July 15th .

Chinese chip designers are winners too, obviously. Getting cut off from Synopsys’s or Cadence’s tools was a nightmare scenario for projects on tight deadlines. Restoring access means development continues, factories keep humming.

But it’s not all sunshine. The underlying tension isn’t fixed. This episode proved, brutally, how dependent China remains on Western tech for the most fundamental parts of semiconductor creation. Expect even more billions poured into Chinese EDA startups like Empyrean. The drive for self-sufficiency just got a massive adrenaline shot, even if the immediate pressure’s off.

Longer term? Hard to see real winners. The US showed it will weaponize tech access. China showed it will weaponize materials. Global supply chains just got riskier and more expensive for everyone.

6. The Geopolitical Chess Game Beyond Chips

Lifting the EDA ban wasn’t just a business decision. It was a carefully played move on a much larger geopolitical board. See, the US and China have been locked in this awkward dance: trying to de-escalate tensions without looking weak back home.

The London agreement framework provided cover. By linking the EDA access to China’s rare earth exports, both sides could claim victory. The US protects its tech crown jewels (mostly), China safeguards its material dominance. It’s a fragile, transactional truce. As one source familiar with the U.S. government talks told Reuters: “The U.S. escalated to de-escalate. They put restrictions on many more items in order to get the Chinese to back off on rare earths... As the U.S. and China continue to hold to this framework agreement, we're gonna see a lot of these restrictions go away. Going back to a status quo, where we were at in Feb/March” .

But February/March wasn’t exactly peaceful either! This is about managing conflict, not friendship. Other pieces are still in play:

• Ethane exports: The US also lifted restrictions on shipping this key plastic ingredient to China .
• Jet engines: Licenses for GE Aerospace to supply engines for China’s COMAC C919 passenger jet were still suspended as of early July . Is that next on the chopping block?
• Student visas: Trump mentioned Chinese students getting access to US universities as part of the deal , showing how broad the bargaining was.

The shadow of August looms large. That’s when the 90-day tariff “truce” struck back in Geneva expires . Will the 55% rates stay? Go higher? Or will this fragile cooperation on niche issues like EDA and rare earths build enough goodwill for a broader deal? Most experts are skeptical. Alfredo Montufar-Helu from The Conference Board put it well: China’s statement on the deal was “encouraging,” but we need to “temper expectation.” These goods are still “crucial bargaining chips” .

7. What Happens Next? The Truce Clock is Ticking

So the software’s flowing again. Rare earth magnets are supposedly moving through Chinese customs faster. Is that it? Problem solved? Hardly. This feels more like hitting the pause button than finding a real solution.

The immediate deadline everyone’s watching is mid-August. That’s when the broader 90-day tariff ceasefire agreed in Geneva back in May expires . What then?

• Scenario 1: Truce Extended. Maybe the goodwill from sorting the EDA/rare earths mess convinces both sides to kick the can down the road. Keep talking, leave tariffs where they are (still painfully high at 55% US / ~33% China).
• Scenario 2: Escalation Returns. Talks stall. The US maybe tacks on more tariffs, citing unfair practices or lack of progress. China retaliates, maybe with new export controls on other critical materials (germanium? gallium?) or by slowing rare earth approvals again.
• Scenario 3: Surprise Breakthrough. Unlikely, but possible. A grand bargain where major tariffs actually get rolled back significantly. Requires huge political will on both sides, especially in an election year looming in the US.

Beyond August, the structural issues remain. The US is dead set on slowing China’s tech rise, especially in artificial intelligence and advanced semiconductors . China is equally determined to break free from Western tech dependence. The EDA reprieve is temporary relief, not a change in direction.

Companies like Synopsys and Cadence might be celebrating now, but they’re also hedging. Expect more investment in diversifying their customer base outside China. And China? They’ll double down on building their own EDA tools, even if it takes a decade. The fundamental distrust is baked in now.

8. Why This Matters for Your Phone, Your Car, and the Global Economy

You might think chip design software and rare earth policy sounds super niche. But the ripple effects touch practically everything.

Your Gadgets: Modern electronics need advanced chips. Those chips need EDA tools to be designed. Disruptions like the May ban create delays and shortages. If rare earth magnets get held up, that impacts production of everything from iPhones to electric car motors (a single Tesla uses kilograms of rare earth magnets). Prices go up. You wait longer for the new model.

Auto Industry: This sector got hammered twice over. Car makers need rare earths for motors. They also rely on countless semiconductors for engine management, infotainment, safety systems. The EDA ban threatened the chip supply already stretched thin. The London deal easing both pressures offers breathing room, but uncertainty lingers .

Global Growth: Trade fights are poison for the world economy. The World Bank just cut its 2025 global growth forecast to a measly 2.3% – the lowest since 2008 outside recessions. They pointed directly to ongoing trade turbulence as a key reason . When the US and China fight, everyone pays. German exports to the US tanked 10.5% in April due to new tariffs; British goods exports to the US fell by a record £2 billion ($2.72 billion) . It’s a drag on everyone.

The lifting of the EDA ban is a small dose of stability. It shows that even fierce rivals can sometimes dial back from the brink when the economic pain gets too sharp. But it’s a temporary fix, not a cure. The underlying disease – deep-seated strategic rivalry between the world’s two largest economies – is still very much there.

---

Frequently Asked Questions

Q1: Did the US completely remove all tech restrictions on China?

No, absolutely not. This specifically lifted the May 2025 export controls on Electronic Design Automation (EDA) software and related technology. Broader restrictions, especially on selling advanced AI chips from companies like Nvidia or AMD to China, remain firmly in place . Licenses for jet engine exports (like GE for China’s C919 jet) also reportedly hadn’t been restored as of early July .

Q2: Why did the US reverse the ban so quickly (within ~6 weeks)?

Two main reasons:

1. Economic Pressure: US companies like Synopsys and Cadence immediately felt the pinch, losing access to 10-16% of their revenue market. They suspended financial forecasts, spooking investors .
2. The Trade Deal Leverage: The ban was part of US retaliation against China’s rare earth export curbs. Lifting it became a key bargaining chip to get China to ease those restrictions as part of the London agreement . Removing it signaled deal compliance.

Q3: Will these chip software restrictions come back?

It’s possible, yes. The broader US-China “truce” on recent escalations is fragile and set to expire in mid-August 2025 . If talks collapse then, the US could easily reimpose the EDA controls or other tech restrictions as a renewed pressure tactic. Companies are likely preparing contingency plans.

Q4: Who "won" from this situation?

It’s mostly a return to the status quo ante, but with lessons:

• US EDA Firms (Synopsys, Cadence, Siemens EDA): Avoided major revenue loss; shares rebounded .
• China’s Chip Industry: Regained access to essential design tools, avoiding project delays/cancellations.
• China’s Government: Demonstrated the power of its rare earth leverage.
• US Government: Secured renewed (though conditional) rare earth flows critical for defense and tech.
  Both sides avoided immediate economic damage, but long-term distrust deepened.

Q5: How much does China rely on US chip design software?

Massively. Synopsys, Cadence, and Siemens EDA collectively control an estimated 70% of China’s EDA market . While China is investing heavily in domestic alternatives, experts agree catching up in complex EDA tools takes many years, if not decades. The brief ban starkly exposed this critical dependency.

Citing My Link Sources:

• https://www.reuters.com/world/china/chip-design-software-firms-rise-us-lifts-curbs-china-exports-2025-07-03/
• https://edition.cnn.com/2025/07/03/business/us-china-chip-software-curbs-lifted-intl-hnk
• https://www.cnbc.com/2025/07/03/us-lifts-chip-software-curbs-on-china-amid-trade-truce-synopsys-says-.html
• https://www.cnbc.com/2025/06/27/china-us-agree-details-of-london-trade-framework-trade-agreement-beijing.html
• https://www.reuters.com/world/china/siemens-says-us-has-lifted-chip-software-curbs-china-bloomberg-news-reports-2025-07-03/
• https://www.weforum.org/stories/2025/06/us-china-deal-and-other-international-trade-stories-to-know-this-month/
• https://www.scmp.com/tech/policy/article/3316742/tech-war-us-lifts-export-control-chip-design-software-china
• https://www.china-briefing.com/news/us-china-tariff-rates-2025/