An Unusual Way to End Up With a Whole Lot of Gold

Key Takeaways

• Scientists at CERN successfully turned lead into gold using particle accelerators in 2025

• Modern alchemy creates approximately 29 picograms of gold during experimental runs

• The process requires enormous energy costs that far exceed the gold's market value

• Gold created through nuclear transmutation remains radioactive and commercially unusable

• Traditional gold investment methods remain more practical for wealth building

• Particle accelerator gold production offers scientific insights rather than financial returns

• The technology validates ancient alchemical theories through modern physics

---

The Atomic Gold Rush Nobody Talks About

The scientists locked themselves in underground tunnels beneath Switzerland. They fired lead atoms at each other at speeds that would make light jealous. And they made gold.

Not the kind you can wear around your neck or stuff under your mattress. Researchers at the Large Hadron Collider have observed a real-life transmutation of lead into gold, though the particles only exist for about a microsecond. The medieval alchemists spent centuries trying to crack this code. These physicists did it on a Tuesday afternoon in 2025.

CERN's ALICE experiment produced an estimated 29 picograms of gold during Run 2 (2015–2018) by creating near-miss collisions with lead nuclei, generating 86 billion gold nuclei. That's enough gold to make a dust mite feel wealthy. The energy bill probably cost more than buying a small country.

The whole operation sounds like something Newton would have dreamed about during his secret alchemy sessions. Except instead of mixing mercury with rabbit blood in his basement, these scientists use machines that could power Manhattan for a month.

How Scientists Actually Make Gold From Scratch

The process works like cosmic billiards played at impossible speeds. The Large Hadron Collider smashes atoms together at super-high speeds, and scientists have found a way to knock three tiny particles called protons out of lead atoms, turning them into gold atoms.

Lead has 82 protons. Gold has 79 protons. Simple math says you subtract three protons from lead and you get gold. Simple physics says you need a machine the size of a small city to do it.

The scientists don't actually collect gold bars at the end of their shifts. LHC experiments don't create large gold nuggets , some particles within a beam of lead ions can turn into gold for about a microsecond. The gold exists long enough for the machines to detect it. Then it vanishes back into the atomic soup.

The detection equipment costs more than most people's houses. The electricity bill could fund a small nation's healthcare system. The gold produced weighs less than a human hair. But they proved it works.

The particle accelerator GSI in Germany can create an astounding two million new gold atoms each second. Two million sounds impressive until you realize that's still basically nothing in terms of actual gold weight.

The Economics of Atomic Alchemy Don't Add Up

Making gold in a particle accelerator is like using a Ferrari to deliver pizza. Sure, you can do it. The pizza arrives. But nobody's getting rich from the business model.

Nuclear transmutation requires particle accelerators and nuclear reactors not designed for gold production, and the gold isotopes created through transmutation are radioactive, making them unusable as an investment vehicle or for industrial purposes.

The radioactive gold can't be sold. Can't be worn. Can't be stored in a vault. It's gold that glows in the dark and kills you if you hold it too long. Not exactly what most gold investors have in mind when they think about portfolio diversification.

The energy costs make the whole enterprise economically insane. Running the Large Hadron Collider for one day costs more than most people earn in several lifetimes. The gold produced during that day weighs less than a grain of salt.

Some startup companies (Marathon) claim they can make the process profitable. A fusion startup (Marathon) claims it can transform mercury into gold, meaning alchemy could become commercially viable. These claims usually come with impressive PowerPoint presentations and requests for investor funding. The actual gold remains elusive.

Traditional gold mining still makes more sense. Dig holes. Find gold. Sell gold. Profit. No particle accelerators required.

What This Means for Real Gold Investors

Real gold investors don't need particle accelerators. They need common sense and basic understanding of market fundamentals. The atomic alchemy experiments prove interesting scientific points but change nothing about gold's investment landscape.

There are several ways to invest in gold, including buying physical gold like gold bars and coins, investing in companies that mine and produce gold products, and investing in gold exchange-traded funds (ETFs).

Physical gold remains the most straightforward approach. You buy it. You own it. You can touch it. It doesn't require a PhD in nuclear physics to understand.

Gold ETFs offer exposure without storage headaches. Physically-backed gold exchange-traded funds (ETFs) account for approximately one-third of the demand for gold as an investment. These funds buy real gold and store it in vaults. Investors buy shares that represent ownership of that gold.

Gold mining stocks provide leveraged exposure to gold prices. When gold prices rise, mining company profits typically rise faster. When gold prices fall, mining stocks usually fall harder. The leverage works both ways.

Gold futures and options trading allows investors to make binding promises to provide or take delivery of a certain amount of gold at a specific price on a specific date. This approach requires more sophisticated understanding of derivatives markets.

The particle accelerator gold changes none of these investment realities. The quantities produced remain negligible. The costs remain prohibitive. The regulatory hurdles remain enormous.

The Science Behind Modern Gold Creation

The physics involved reads like science fiction written by someone with a PhD in nuclear engineering. CERN scientists have briefly turned lead into gold by smashing nuclei at near-light speed, offering new insights into nuclear physics rather than alchemical riches.

The ALICE experiment uses lead ions accelerated to 99.9999% the speed of light. When these ions collide, they create conditions similar to what existed microseconds after the Big Bang. In these extreme conditions, protons and neutrons get knocked around like pool balls in a cosmic game.

The energy densities involved exceed anything found naturally on Earth. The temperatures reach trillions of degrees. The pressures would crush diamond into powder. In this environment, the normal rules of chemistry break down completely.

Nuclear transmutation becomes possible when you have enough energy to overcome the strong nuclear force holding atomic nuclei together. This force keeps protons stuck together despite their mutual electrical repulsion. Breaking this force requires enormous amounts of energy.

The scientists measure the results using detectors that can identify individual atomic nuclei. They track the lead ions going into the collision and identify the gold nuclei coming out. The entire process gets recorded by computers analyzing millions of collisions per second.

The gold nuclei produced are typically unstable isotopes. They decay rapidly into other elements through radioactive processes. This instability prevents the gold from being collected or used commercially.

Why Ancient Alchemists Would Be Disappointed

Medieval alchemists spent centuries trying to turn base metals into gold. They mixed chemicals, heated metals, and consulted astrological charts. They believed they could discover the philosopher's stone that would make transmutation possible.

These alchemists would probably feel vindicated knowing that lead-to-gold transmutation actually works. They might feel less enthusiastic about the implementation details.

The modern version requires machines costing billions of dollars. The ancient alchemists worked with equipment they could build in their workshops. The particle accelerator approach needs international cooperation between dozens of countries.

The medieval alchemists imagined creating gold they could spend. The gold isotopes created through modern transmutation are radioactive, making them unusable as currency or jewelry. Ancient alchemists wanted to get rich. Modern scientists want to understand fundamental physics.

The energy requirements would have baffled medieval practitioners. They heated their materials with wood fires or oil lamps. The modern process requires enough electricity to power entire cities. The scale difference makes the ancient approach look quaint by comparison.

The quantities produced would have frustrated any profit-minded alchemist. CERN's experiments created 86 billion gold nuclei, but that still amounts to only 29 picograms of actual gold. A medieval alchemist could have earned more money selling fake potions to gullible customers.

The scientific validation comes with practical limitations that make the ancient dream commercially impossible. The alchemists wanted gold they could hold, spend, and accumulate. The modern version exists for nanoseconds before disappearing.

The Future of Artificial Gold Production

Some companies (Marathon) think they can crack the gold-making code profitably. They wave around plans for fusion reactors and next-generation accelerators. They promise revolutionary breakthroughs that will solve the energy problem.

The math doesn't care about their optimism. Nuclear forces don't negotiate. You still need massive energy to pry protons loose from lead nuclei. A fancier machine doesn't change atomic physics.

Researchers float ideas about neutron bombardment using nuclear reactors. Hit mercury atoms with neutrons until they become gold atoms. Sounds cleaner than the proton-removal approach. The energy bills still arrive monthly. The gold isotopes still decay into useless radioactive dust.

Fusion reactors might change the game completely , if they ever work. Cheap fusion energy could make transmutation affordable. But fusion remains the energy source of the future and always will be. The tokamaks keep promising commercial viability in twenty years. They've been promising that since the 1950s.

Government regulators love radioactive processes about as much as vampires love garlic. Artificial gold production means handling nuclear materials, high-energy radiation, and unstable isotopes. The licensing paperwork alone could kill a startup. Commercial operations face regulatory approval processes measured in decades rather than quarters.

The market would punish successful artificial gold producers through supply and demand. Flood the market with artificial gold and prices crash. Lower prices make the expensive production process unprofitable. Basic economics working against basic physics.

Traditional gold miners keep getting better at their jobs. New exploration techniques find deposits faster. Extraction methods pull more gold from lower-grade ore. Processing technologies reduce waste and increase yields. Artificial production competes against an industry that improves every year.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Can scientists really make gold in particle accelerators? 

A: Yes, scientists at CERN have successfully converted lead atoms into gold atoms using the Large Hadron Collider. However, the gold only exists for microseconds and the quantities are extremely small.

Q: Is particle accelerator gold commercially valuable? 

A: No, the gold produced is radioactive, exists only briefly, and costs far more to produce than its market value. It's scientifically significant but commercially worthless.

Q: How much gold can particle accelerators produce? 

A: CERN's ALICE experiment produced approximately 29 picograms of gold over several years. That's less than the weight of a single grain of pollen.

Q: Will artificial gold production affect gold prices? 

A: Current technology produces such tiny quantities that it has no impact on gold markets. Even theoretical improvements wouldn't produce enough gold to significantly affect global supply.

Q: Is this the same as what ancient alchemists tried to do? 

A: Conceptually yes - both involve converting lead to gold. However, medieval alchemists used chemical processes while modern scientists use nuclear physics, and the practical results are completely different.

Q: Could fusion reactors make gold production cheaper? 

A: Potentially, but even with cheap fusion energy, the technical challenges and regulatory hurdles would likely prevent commercial gold production through nuclear transmutation.

Q: Should I invest in companies claiming to make artificial gold? 

A: Exercise extreme caution. The physics and economics of artificial gold production remain prohibitively expensive, and most such claims lack credible scientific backing.

Q: How does this discovery impact traditional gold investing? 

A: It doesn't. The quantities are negligible, the costs are enormous, and the timeline for any commercial application remains indefinite. Traditional gold investment methods remain unaffected.