Skip to main content

Trump Fires BLS Commissioner Erika McEntarfer After 73K Jobs Report, 258K Downward Revisions & Market Slump

 Trump Fires BLS Commissioner Erika McEntarfer After 73K Jobs Report, 258K Downward Revisions & Market Slump

Trump Fires BLS Commissioner Erika McEntarfer After 73K Jobs Report, 258K Downward Revisions & Market Slump

Key Takeaways

  • President Trump fired BLS Commissioner Erika McEntarfer hours after July’s weak jobs report showed only 73,000 jobs added and massive downward revisions for May/June .
  • Accusations without evidence: Trump claimed McEntarfer manipulated data to help Kamala Harris in the 2024 election, despite her Senate confirmation (86-8) and bipartisan respect .
  • Markets recoiled: Stocks plunged (Dow -600 pts, Nasdaq -2%), Treasury yields fell, and Fed rate cut odds surged to 80% for September .
  • Expert backlash: Economists called the firing “deeply worrisome,” stressing BLS data’s independence as the “gold standard” for global labor metrics .
  • Context: Trump previously praised BLS reports when favorable and proposed an 8% staff cut at the agency earlier in 2025 .

The Phone Rang at Dawn

The phone rang at dawn. The kind of call that starts with silence and ends with a packed box on your desk. Erika McEntarfer knew the drill. Twenty years in the federal trenches, Census, Treasury, White House councils, teaches you the sound of endings. The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) job is counting things. Jobs. Wages. Hours. The weight of numbers. Friday’s report landed like a bad joke: 73,000 jobs added in July. June’s number got hacked to 14,000. May bled 125,000 in revisions. The three-month average? 35,000. Stall speed .


Truth Social at 8 AM

Trump tapped his phone. A Truth Social post cut the air: “Biden Appointee Dr. Erika McEntarfer faked the Jobs Numbers before the Election.” No evidence. Just heat. He demanded her head, “IMMEDIATELY.” By lunch, her security pass died . Career staff at the BLS felt the old chill. The agency’s mission statement hangs in every hallway: “support public and private decision making.” Not today. Today, decisions came from a man who called Fed Chair Jerome Powell a “stubborn MORON” in the same breath .

  • The sequence:
  • Jobs report released at 8:30 AM.
  • Trump’s post at 10:17 AM.
  • McEntarfer escorted out by 11:45 AM .

Markets Eat Their Young

Traders smelled blood. The Dow dropped 600 points. The Nasdaq bled 2%. Bond yields cratered, 10-year Treasuries fell to 4.26%. “Not good. No way to sugarcoat that,” said Steve Sosnick of Interactive Brokers . Fed funds futures twisted: 80% odds for a September rate cut. Up from 40% yesterday. “Powell will regret holding steady,” spat Jamie Cox of Harris Financial Group. Recessions start like this, slow leaks no one patches in time .


The BLS Machine

The Bureau of Labor Statistics isn’t a casino. It’s a factory. Each month, 121,000 employers get calls. How many workers? What hours? Answers get shredded, weighted, seasonally adjusted. Revisions happen. Always have. It’s not conspiracy, it’s more data rolling in. Last August, they found 818,000 fewer jobs existed than first thought. Routine. Boring. Essential .

Countries that fake statistics end up in economic crises,” said Jason Furman, Obama’s ex-adviser. “This is Venezuela stuff.


McEntarfer’s Crime

Her sin? Publishing numbers that didn’t bend. July’s 73,000 jobs missed estimates by 31,000. The prior revisions, 258,000 jobs erased, stank of decay. Trump’s team called June’s original 147,000 a “June Boom.” The revised 14,000? Silence. McEntarfer, confirmed by 86 senators (including Vance), lasted 19 months. Her predecessor? 12 years .


The Wrecking Crew

Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer backed the firing. “Major revisions raised concerns,” she tweeted. Economists recoiled. Mark Zandi of Moody’s: “I’ve never seen anything close to this.” Paul Schroeder of the stats council: “Grave error.” The BLS ranks are full of lifers, people who argue over decimal points. They don’t expect flowers. But they don’t expect knives either .


Powell’s Problem

Jerome Powell sat stiff Wednesday. Held rates steady. “Too soon to cut,” he said. Friday’s jobs report laughed at him. Traders priced in two 2024 cuts minimum. Atlanta Fed’s Raphael Bostic muttered about “troublesome positions.” Trump wants Powell “out to pasture.” The Fed chair’s crime? Not cutting rates fast enough for a president waging trade wars .


The New Numbers Game

Bill Wiatrowski runs the BLS now. Acting director. Obama-era hire. His first task: prep the August report under a president who called stats “political.” The White House blames “tariff uncertainty” and “border crackdowns” for the jobs slump. Economists see stall speed. 35,000 jobs won’t cover population growth. Not even close .

Virginia Senator Mark Warner: “Firing the ump doesn’t change the score.


FAQs

Why did Trump fire the BLS commissioner?

He accused her, without evidence, of manipulating jobs data to help Kamala Harris in the 2024 election. The firing came hours after a weak July jobs report showed minimal growth (73,000 jobs) and massive downward revisions (-258,000) for May/June .

Are BLS revisions normal?

Yes. Monthly jobs data gets revised twice as more employer surveys arrive. Annual benchmarks align figures with unemployment insurance records. Revisions ensure accuracy, not political bias .

How did markets react?

Stocks plummeted (Dow -600, Nasdaq -2%), Treasury yields fell, and bets on a September Fed rate cut jumped to 80%. Traders fear the slowing labor market signals recession .

Was the jobs report really that bad?

July’s 73,000 jobs missed estimates (110,000). Combined with revisions, the 3-month average fell to 35,000, below the 100,000-150,000 needed to keep pace with population growth. Unemployment rose to 4.2% .

Can Trump legally fire the BLS commissioner?

Yes. The role serves at the president’s pleasure. However, firing a respected nonpartisan (confirmed 86-8 by the Senate) over unfavorable data breaks 80 years of statistical independence norms .

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

AI Data Center in Wyoming to Use 5x More Electricity Than Residents - Crusoe Tallgrass 10-Gigawatt Project Energy Demand vs State Grid Capacity

AI Data Center in Wyoming to Use 5x More Electricity Than Residents - Crusoe Tallgrass 10-Gigawatt Project Energy Demand vs State Grid Capacity Key Takeaways A proposed AI data center near Cheyenne, Wyoming, will start at  1.8 gigawatts  of power, five times  the electricity used by all homes in the state . At full scale (10 gigawatts), the facility would consume  double  Wyoming’s current total electricity generation . The project, a partnership between  Tallgrass Energy  and  Crusoe Energy , will use dedicated gas and renewable power, avoiding the public grid . Wyoming typically exports 60% of its generated electricity but will pivot to hosting a massive local consumer . Speculation links the project to  OpenAI ’s "Stargate" infrastructure, though no tenant has been confirmed . The Numbers Are Nuts Mayor Patrick Collins calls it a game changer. He’s not wrong. This data center starts at  1.8 gigawatts . That’s more electricity than eve...

Amazon Prime Price Hike 2025: Members Brace for Sticker Shock as Analysts Predict Fee Increase

  Key takeaways 💸  Price hike expected : Amazon Prime may increase to $159/year in 2026 (up $20 from current $139), continuing its 4-year cycle of increases . 📺  More ads rolling out : Prime Video now shows more commercials, with an extra $2.99/month fee for ad-free viewing, sparking user complaints about "unbearable" ad frequency . 🚛  Shipping still anchors value : Free fast shipping remains Prime's core draw, with analysts estimating membership value at ~$1,430/year despite price hikes . 🎓  Discounts exist : Students, EBT recipients, and Medicaid enrollees qualify for discounted Prime memberships . The $20 bump: What analysts see coming Wall Street's buzzing about Prime's next move, J.P. Morgan predicts a $159/year fee by 2026. Which, if you do the math, would be a $20 jump from today's $139 rate. They say this fits Amazon's pattern: roughly every four years, the cost creeps up. Like, back in 2014 it was $79, then $99... then $119 in 2018, and $139 i...

Sydney Sweeney American Eagle Ad Backlash: Great Jeans Campaign Sparks Oversexualization Debate, Meme Stock Surge & Anti-Woke Praise

  Key Takeaways Sydney Sweeney’s American Eagle campaign sparked intense backlash for its sexualized tone while promoting domestic violence awareness, with critics calling it “tone-deaf” . Fans praised the ads for rejecting “woke advertising,” celebrating the return of playful, body-confident marketing they felt was missing . American Eagle’s stock surged 10-22% following the campaign’s launch, fueled by social media buzz and short squeezes, positioning it as a new “meme stock” . The brand shifted strategy by featuring Sweeney as its solo campaign star, a first, calling her their “biggest get ever” to reconnect with Gen Z and compete with fast fashion . Despite controversy, the campaign’s charitable angle donated 100% of “The Sydney Jean” proceeds ($89.95/pair) to Crisis Text Line, a mental health support service for abuse survivors . The Mechanics of Sydney Sweeney’s American Eagle Campaign American Eagle took a massive gamble by centering its entire fall 2025 strategy on one face...

China's Rare Earth Dominance: Supply Chain Control, Global Impact & U.S. Response (2025)

Key Takeaways China controls  90% of rare earth processing , leveraging decades of strategic policy and lax environmental standards . Heavy rare earths like  terbium and dysprosium  face near-total Chinese monopoly, crippling defense and green tech sectors . New export controls enacted in 2024 allow Beijing to  restrict dual-use items , impacting semiconductors and AI technology . A Chinese Academy of Sciences study predicts China’s share of rare earth mining will drop to  28% by 2035  as global rivals emerge . U.S. ventures like  NioCorp  and  Phoenix Tailings  struggle against Chinese pricing power and investor skepticism . Underground Vaults and Global Panic Deep in a WWII-era vault near Frankfurt, Louis O’Connor guards ingots of terbium and dysprosium. Armed patrols circle thick concrete walls. Investors beg to buy his entire stock. China just tightened export controls on seven rare earth elements. O’Connor calls it a “tap system.” B...

Robinhood & AppLovin S&P 500 Eligibility: Why Paramount Merger Could Trigger Entry | Index Inclusion Criteria, Market Cap Analysis & Stock Impact

Robinhood & AppLovin S&P 500 Eligibility: Why Paramount Merger Could Trigger Entry | Index Inclusion Criteria, Market Cap Analysis & Stock Impact Key Takeaways Paramount’s Precarious Position : The Skydance merger could trigger S&P 500 removal due to its $9.5B market cap falling below the $22.7B new-entrant threshold . Robinhood & AppLovin’s Eligibility : Both meet market cap ($93B and $123B) and profitability requirements but face repeated exclusion despite speculation . S&P’s Sector Balancing Act : Financials (Robinhood) and tech (AppLovin) are underrepresented, yet S&P may prefer less volatile mid-cap promotions like Interactive Brokers . Political Wildcard : FCC’s ideologically driven approval of Paramount’s sale, mandating “diverse viewpoints” and ending DEI programs, adds uncertainty to its index retention . The Paramount Shake-Up Paramount Global claws at its S&P 500 slot by a technicality. Its $9.5 billion market cap languishes below the $22.7 bi...

Trump Japan Trade Deal: Uncertain $550 Billion Investment Claim | Tariff Reduction Implications | US-Japan Economic Relations Analysis

  Key Takeaways 💰  $550 billion pledge : Japan commits to massive U.S. investment directed by Trump, but details remain vague and non-binding . ⚠️  Uncertain terms : No formal written agreement exists; Japanese officials contradict U.S. claims on profit splits and enforcement . ⏳  Repackaged deals? : Funds may relabel existing projects (e.g., TSMC’s Arizona plants) rather than fuel new ventures . ⚖️  Tariff leverage : Japan secured 15% auto tariffs (down from 25%) by offering the investment, a model for South Korea/EU talks . 📉  Expert skepticism : Economists call the pledge “vaporware,” citing Japan’s weak incentive to invest amid high U.S. costs and legal risks to tariffs . The $550 Billion Headline: What Trump Announced President Trump called it “the largest deal ever made” when he announced Japan’s pledge to invest $550 billion into U.S. industries at his personal direction. Standing in the Oval Office, he framed it as a total win, Japan’s cash would ...